Showing posts with label Security Management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Security Management. Show all posts

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Four "Basic" Ways To Protect Company Data

Breach at Target appears to have started with a malware-infected email!

Target Corp. and other large retailers have made the news due to data breaches, but businesses of all sizes need to make sure they have up-to-date policies and procedures to protect private data.

The breaches at Target highlight how important it is for organizations to know how secure their networks are?

Here are four measures businesses should take to ensure their data stays private.
  • One obvious way is to make sure your business' security software is up to date and working "to make sure you don't leave holes in your technology.
  • Do you have policies and procedures in place for how employees interact with the business' server and network? Such measures include making sure employees have strong passwords for their computers and other devices, keeping their machines updated with the latest anti-virus protection and providing them with general awareness on things to watch out for, such as phishing messages (scams that ask people to give out personal information or prompt a person to click on a link that will infect their computer with malware).
  • Make sure that employees have safeguards on the personal devices they use to connect to the company's network.
  • Don't forget security measures for paper records.

Monday, December 30, 2013

XSS For Managers

What is Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)?

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) is a type of vulnerability which is very widespread and allows an attacker to insert malicious code (JavaScript) into your web browser via the use of a vulnerable web application. The attacker can deliver their malicious code in a number of different ways.

They can trick you into clicking on a link (Reflected XSS), or wait for you to visit a page which already has the malicious code embedded into it (Stored or Persistent XSS).


That annoying pop-up box with the number 1 in it? That's just a way that some people visually prove that their JavaScript (XSS) has been run. But don't let that lousy pop-up box fool you, there is a lot more to XSS than that!

What can hackers do with XSS?

  • A hacker may be able to steal your 'cookies' and login to the application as if they were you!
  • They may be able to redirect you to a malicious web site without you knowing in an attempt to trick you into giving away sensitive information such as your bank details.
  • They could add fake login pages to the vulnerable application to trick you into giving them your username and password.
  • They could even use XSS to bypass other security measures which are built into the application and your web browser to protect you.
  • The possibilities are almost limitless. Take over your webcam? Yep! Listen in on your computer's microphone?

For advanced attacks see the The Browser Exploitation Framework (BeEF) tool.

Who's been hacked using XSS?

  • The Apache Foundation, the creators and maintainers of one of the most popular web server software on the Internet had their servers compromised by an initial XSS attack.
  • An XSS attack on the official forum of the popular Linux Operating System, Ubuntu, allowed the attackers to download the usernames, email addresses and passwords for 1.82 million of their users.
  • XSS attacks typically target the application's users and their local networks; however, as seen in the examples above, when those users are administrative users the application's web servers are also at risk.
  • XSS vulnerabilities are discovered within Facebook, Yahoo, Google, Twitter and other high profile websites on a daily basis by independent security researchers participating in bug bounties.
Here is a list of other hacks using XSS -https://www.google.com/fusiontables/DataSource?snapid=S1158702BBoV

What can I do to protect myself against XSS?

  • Make sure that your web browser is kept up to date and that it has all of its security features enabled, such as Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) filtering. If your particular browser does not have an XSS filter, like Firefox, then you can download an XSS filter add-on called NoScript.
  • Be careful about what links you click on. A link may look harmless enough, but may contain malicious XSS payloads.
  • Log out of web sites when you are finished with them, this makes it harder for hackers to steal your 'cookies'.

The technical bit! What can I do to protect my web application against XSS?

  • Cross-Site Scripting occurs when untrusted input is output to a page without first being sanitised and/or properly encoded. For example, if a user supplies their username to login and then you display that username without sanitising and/or encoding it, what happens if the username contains HTML characters?

    The web browser will not be able to tell the difference between the user's username and what is the page's valid HTML. Data (the username) is being mixed with code (the HTML)! This could allow a user to login with a username that contains malicious JavaScript and have it execute in the browser within the context of your web application.
  • Make sure that you sanitise the username before using it, for example, if users should only have alpha numeric characters in their usernames then enforce this with input sanitisation. Use a whitelist! Compare the username against known goods instead of known bads.
  • Use the right encoding! If the username is going to be used within HTML, then HTML encode all of the username's characters.

    This way the browser will know what is meant to be rendered as HTML and what is not. It's not all about HTML encoding though! You must encode for the right output 'context'. See the links below for further information.
  • Scan your applications for XSS issues. There are many automated web application security scanners which can detect XSS issues in web applications. You could try giving the Open Source OWASP ZAP a go.
  • Set your session cookies with the HttpOnly flag. This tells the browser that the cookie should not be accessed by JavaScript, helping protect your users from having their sessions stolen.
  • A HTTP header called Content Security Policy (CSP) can be set by the web server to tell the web browser what and where JavaScript is allowed to be executed from. It uses a whitelist!
  • Finally, why not install a Web Application Firewall (WAF) such as the Open Source mod_security! A WAF will give your application that extra layer of defence to defend against those attackers but should be used in a defense in depth scenario and not as the only solution as bypasses are found often.

Where can I find further information?

The two types of XSS mentioned on this page (Reflected and Stored) are not the only two! We have only touched upon the subject here. Want to find out more?

The Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) is a great resource for all things related to the security of web applications. Check out their wiki article on XSS or their XSS Prevention Cheat Sheet. For information on other types of web application vulnerabilities take a look at the OWASP Top 10.

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Information Security Forum (ISF) Identifies 6 Major Threats for 2014

ISF report states top six security threats global business will face in 2014 include the cloud, "BYO" trends and cyber-crime

A nonprofit group founded in 1989, the ISF performs research on topics dictated by its 350-plus global member organizations. Only recently has it begun making its findings public.

The six threats identified as major concerns headed into 2014, ISF emphasized the need for companies to find trusted partners and talk about cyber-security—a topic that's often treated as private.

Six: BYO

Trends Topping the ISF's list is BYO, and it's no mistake that the "D" is missing. Workers bring their email accounts, their cloud storage and more. As the trend of employees bringing mobile devices in the workplace grows, businesses of all sizes continue to see information security risks being exploited. These risks stem from both internal and external threats, including mismanagement of the device itself, external manipulation of software vulnerabilities and the deployment of poorly tested, unreliable business applications.

Five: Data Privacy In the Cloud

The cloud presented no danger, as long as one could tick off a list of items, including knowing how many clouds a company has; what other companies' data are being stored on the same servers; whether one's storage services are being subcontracted; and if there's a clear plan for what happens when a contract with a cloud provider is terminated. While the cost and efficiency benefits of cloud computing services are clear, organizations cannot afford to delay getting to grips with their information security implications.

Organizations must know whether the information they are holding about an individual is Personally Identifiable Information (PII) and therefore needs adequate protection.

Four: Reputational Damage

There are two types of companies—those that have been hacked and those that are going to be. What would a hack mean to your marketing manager, to your head of investor services, to your PR team that needs to put out that statement?. When the situation is something that could send stock prices plummeting, the reality of it sets in.

Three: Privacy and Regulation

Organizations need to treat privacy as both a compliance and a business risk, according to the ISF. "Furthermore," the report added, "we are seeing increasing plans for regulation around the collection, storage and use of information along with severe penalties for loss of data and breach notification, particularly across the European Union. Expect this to continue and develop further, imposing an overhead [cost] in regulatory management above and beyond the security function and necessarily including legal, HR and board level input."

Two: Cyber-Crime

ISF emphasized how shockingly excellent criminals are at coordinating and working together toward a cause. The Syrian Electronic Army's hack into The New York Times was offered as an example. The bad guys are really great at collaboration, because there's a lot in it for them.

Cyber-crime, hacktivism—hacking for a cause—and the rising costs of compliance, to deal with the uptick in regulatory compliance issues, can create a perfect storm of sorts,. "Organizations that identify what the business relies on most will be well-placed to quantify the business case to invest in resilience, therefore minimizing the impact of the unforeseen.

One: The Internet of Things 

High-speed networks and the Internet of Things will create scenarios like the ability for a car to detect a traffic jam ahead and understand that its driver won't make it to the airport in time for his flight—and so contact the airport to change the flight. That level of information, in the wrong hands, is concerning.

Businesses can't avoid every serious incident, and few have a "mature, structured approach for analyzing what went wrong.

By adopting a realistic, broad-based, collaborative approach to cyber-security and resilience, government departments, regulators, senior business managers and information security professionals will be better able to understand the true nature of cyber-threats and respond quickly and appropriately." 

Thursday, November 21, 2013

The State of Risk-Based Security 2013

The State of Risk-Based Security Management is an in-depth study conducted by Ponemon Institute

Industrial control systems continue to draw scrutiny as the risks involved in preserving aging IT infrastructures continue to escalate. Mission-critical systems in everything from manufacturing facilities to public utilities have shown to be easily breached and highly vulnerable.

A new Ponemon Institute survey, however, found that security efforts in the sector are ramping up: 51% use formal risk assessments to identify security risks – which is higher than the broader enterprise average.

Also, the survey found a majority (86%) believe that minimizing noncompliance with laws and regulations helps meet certain business objectives – and that’s also 5% higher than the average.

Risk-based security is coming onto the radar screen too: 43% measure the reduction in unplanned system downtime to assess the effectiveness of cost-containment management efforts, differing from survey average of 38%. And about half (52%) listed the “flow of upstream communications” as one of the top three features most critical to the success of a risk-based security management approach – an 8% increase over the survey average of 46%.

Even so, this is not enough to protect ICS systems against determined attackers. For instance, only 56% listed an “openness to challenge assumptions” as one of the top three features most critical to the success of a risk-based security management approach – and this is 6% lower than the survey average of 62%.

Further, It is imperative for this sector to get a handle on system hardening and configuration management practices to improve security and reliability. But in this regard though, the industrial sector is less effective than other industries in deploying risk management controls and communicating effectively about security.

Only 40% have fully or partially deployed security configuration management, differing from the survey average of 49%, and 75% have fully or partially deployed system hardening, which is 5% lower than the survey average of 80%.

When it comes to organizational culture, security still has a long way to go to permeating the business.
Most ICS respondents (69%) said security communications are contained in only one department or line of business, differing from the survey average of 63%. And 67% said security communications occur at too low a level, differing from the survey average of 62% – indicating needed oversight from the C-level is generally lacking.
Even though industrial sector organizations are actively considering security risks, they must also improve their willingness to elevate key risks to the executive level. Security risks must be considered in context with overall business risk or the entire organization’s success will be in jeopardy.

Friday, November 8, 2013

Kaspersky Lab 2013 Global Corporate IT Security Risks

34% of respondents ranked protection from incidents as the top priority

Kaspersky Lab, in partnership with research company B2B International, conducts regular surveys focusing on the key IT security issues and cyber threats which worry businesses.

The survey aimed to find out what representatives of these companies thought of corporate security solutions, to ascertain their level of knowledge about cyber threats, what cyber security related problems they most often face, how they address these problems and what they expect in the future.

2013 Kaspersky Lab and B2B International survey results provided below reflect the opinions of companies on key issues related to the security of the corporate IT infrastructure.

They also reflect the changes that have taken place since the previous two studies. Comparing current and historical data helps to identify and analyze existing trends in this area, ultimately creating a complete and, we believe, objective picture of the threat landscape, as well as future problems and trends affecting corporate IT security.

Main Findings

According to the survey results, one of the major problems facing businesses is the creation of a clear IT infrastructure development strategy with an information security strategy at its heart.

Companies are increasingly determined to secure their IT infrastructure in the light of increasing numbers of incidents – and significant financial losses associated with them. The main findings of the survey are:

  • Maintaining information security is the main issue faced by a company’s IT management.
  • In the past 12 months, 91% of the companies surveyed had at least one external IT security incident and 85% reported internal incidents.
  • A serious incident can cost a large company an average of $649,000; for small and medium-sized companies the bill averages at about $50,000.
  • A successful targeted attack on a large company can cost it $2.4 million in direct financial losses and additional costs.
  • For a medium-sized or small company, a targeted attack can mean about $92,000 in damages – almost twice as much as an average attack.
  • A significant proportion of incidents resulting in the loss of valuable data were internal, caused by issues such as unclosed vulnerabilities in software used by the company, intentional or negligent actions of employees or the loss or theft of mobile devices.
  • Personal mobile devices used for work-related purposes remain one of the main hazards for businesses: 65% of those surveyed saw a threat in the Bring Your Own Device policy.
  • Information leaks committed using mobile devices – intentionally or accidentally – constitute the main internal threat that companies are concerned about for the future.

For the full report in PDF format, click here.

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

How and why the Chief Information Security Officer role is evolving?

A new standard for security leadership

How can security leaders help achieve business objectives?

Am I doing enough to protect our enterprise?

How can I measure success?

These questions come up time and time again for Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) and other security leaders. Just as technology constantly evolves and threats shift, the needs of the business change with regards to security and risk. Security leaders have to constantly reassess, adjust, and improve their skills. Those with the right combination of business practices, technology maturity and measurement capabilities are evolving into more versatile security leaders.


Download full graphic version from here.

Monday, October 28, 2013

Collaboration among various sectors is must for protection against cyber-attacks

Information sharing can facilitate, the more effective fighting efforts against cyber-attacks

Sharing information about cyber-attacks is making a difference in the banking sector, helping bring criminals to justice and curbing fraud losses. And other sectors should learn from banking's example.

It's important for information security professionals to continue their efforts to get senior executives to buy in to the need for cross-industry collaboration. Informal sharing of cyber-intelligence has for years been a common practice among cybersecurity warriors in the trenches.

This type of information sharing, however, often has gone on in the background without the knowledge of upper management. That's because many executives are fearful of revealing too much or sharing with competitors their security vulnerabilities. But that attitude is, slowing but surely, changing.

What's more, the intelligence the financial industry has gathered over the last 12 months about al-Qassam and other attackers was shared with law enforcement, government and others. In fact, much of the information federal investigators gather about cyber-espionage and cyber-attacks comes from the financial sector first.

Those kind of partnerships are needed in other industry sectors as well. Cyber-attacks affect numerous industries, from hospitality and retail to healthcare and government. The more information sharing these sectors can facilitate, the more effective fraud-fighting efforts will be.

Monday, September 23, 2013

How To Reduce Application Security Risk?

Survey shows serious misalignment between IT Executives & Engineers

Ponemon Institute independently surveyed 642 IT professionals in both executive and engineering positions. The majority of the respondents were at a supervisory level or higher. Over half of the respondents are employed by organizations of more than 5,000 employees.

Based on the responses, the primary finding is that a much higher percentage of executive-level respondents believe their organizations are following security procedures through the lifecycle of application development than do the engineers who are closest to executing the security processes.

This is a serious and potentially dangerous misalignment. Another troubling conclusion is that most organizations are only taking minimal steps to address application security throughout their development process.

The most effective way to reduce application security risk is to implement a formal, repeatable development process that includes secure coding standards to enable the early detection and remediation of vulnerabilities.

Mature organizations tend to have highly effective application security programs that include the three pillars of a secure SDLC:

  • Application Security Standards
  • Regular Security Assessments for measurement
  • Training for each role in the SDLC


The mature organizations share common characteristics by:

  • Writing and adopting security architecture and development standards.
  • Training their development teams on application security topics based on role, platform, and technology used.
  • Conducting regular assessments on their applications and processes to make sure the implementation of standards is effective.
  • Ensuring that their executives, technicians and staff understand the importance of application security as part of the organizations’ overall risk management strategy and collaborate on ensuring the practices described above are in place.

Friday, September 13, 2013

How To Develop Security Awareness?

Six Steps To Successful Security Awareness Training

If you would schedule an event to teach people about Internet Security, and make it optional to attend, only about 5% of your entire office population will show up. And guess what, those 5% are probably the people that need it least.

Here are the six elements of a successful Internet Security Awareness Training Program

  • Formulate, and make easily available a written Security Policy.
  • Each employee needs to read the document and sign it as an acknowledgment they understand the policy and will apply it.
  • Give all employees a mandatory (online) Security Awareness Course, with a clearly stated deadline. It is highly recommended to explain to them in some detail why this is necessary.
  • Make this Security Awareness Course part of the onboarding process of each new employee.
  • Keep all employees on their toes with security top of mind, by continued testing. Sending a simulated phishing attack once a week is extremely effective to keep them alert.
  • Never publicly identify an employee that fails a simulated attack, let their supervisor or HR take this up privately. Give a quarterly prize for the three employees with the lowest ‘fail-rate’.
  • If you use posters, stickers and or screensavers, change the pictures or messages monthly. After a few weeks people simple don’t ‘see’ them anymore. It’s more effective to send them regular ‘Security Hints & Tips’ via email.

Friday, August 30, 2013

Top 5 Tools Every Security Professional Must Learn

5 basic tools for security professionals

As the role of the information security professional continues to evolve within organizations towards that of an executive level position, we see a growing emphasis on traditional business administration skills over the more technical skills that previously defined the top security leadership job.

Nonetheless, Information Security Professionals need to keep abreast of the latest down-in-the-weeds tools and technologies that can benefit their organization’s security posture, as well as those tools that are widely available which could be misused by malicious actors to identify and exploit network security weaknesses.

ToolsWatch is a free interactive service designed to help auditors, penetration testers, and other security professionals keep their ethical hacking toolbox up to date with the latest and greatest resources.

ARMITAGE

Metasploit has become over the years the best framework to conduct penetration testing on network systems and IT infrastructure. Nevertheless, Armitage an open source effort to bring user-friendly interface to Metasploit.


Armitage demonstrations are very convincing and allow you to analyze weak and vulnerable machines in a network in just a few clicks. This tool has brilliantly hidden the complexity of Metasploit (for a non-technical audience) in favor of usability, and is a great way to demonstrate the security in depth of an IT architecture.

HASHCAT

There is constantly a battle between security folks and users when it comes to passwords. Although it is simple to deploy a Password Policy in a company, it’s also very difficult to justify it.


Because in a perfect world from users perspective, the best password would be the name of the family cat with no expiration date, and this fact applies  to any system that requires authentication.

HashCat has shown that the selection of a strong  password must be done carefully, and this tool allows us to demonstrate the ease with which a password can be recovered.

WIFITE

You know what you have connected to when using your hardwired network, but have you ever wondered if the air is playing tricks on you? To test your WiFi security, Wifite has the simplest way.


Wifite allows the discovery of all devices that have an active wireless capability enabled by default (like some printers for example). Wifite is a very simple and convincing way to validate the security of wireless networks.

WIRESHARK

Known for many years as Ethereal, WireShark is probably the best tool when it comes to sniffing for and collecting data over a network.


On the one hand, WireShark has boosted its capabilities with the support of several types of networks (Ethernet, 802.11, etc.) and also in the simplicity of its use through a very friendly user interface.

WireShark allows to demonstrate that outdated protocols such as Telnet / FTP should be banned from a corporate network, and that sensitive information should be encrypted to avoid being captured by a malicious user

SOCIAL ENGINEERING TOOLKIT (SET)

SET is a framework that helps the in creation of sophisticated technical attacks which operated using the credulity of the human. It can be used in the process of preparing a phishing attack mimicking a known website or trapping PDF files with the appropriate payload. The simplicity of use via an intuitive menu makes it an even more attractive tool.


It is the dream of every CISO to drive security awareness campaigns without ruining the security budget. With SET, the team in charge of security audits can design attacks scenarios and distribute them internally to the targeted users.

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

DDoS Security Checklist

Help I am under DDoS!! What should I do?

DoS or Denial of Service is an attempt to make a machine or network resource unavailable to its intended users. When such a DoS is carried out by a large number of attack sources, it is called DDoS or Distributed Denial of Service.

Basic types are:

  • Consumption of computational resources
  • Disruption of configuration information
  • Disruption of state information
  • Disruption of physical network
  • Disruption of the communication media between the victim and its intended users.

How can I prevent DDoS?

While it would be incorrect to say that DDoS attacks can be prevented, the impact can be mitigated and even thwarted if your IT infrastructure is sufficiently hardened, distributed and secured. We have listed some of the preventive steps below:

  • Use rate-limiting in firewalls, routers, load balancers and other network perimeter devices.
  • Enable TCP SYN cookie protection.
  • Test your applications and deployment architecture for DoS vulnerabilities and fix them.
  • Conduct regular configuration audits of your perimeter devices.
  • Use updated software/firmware
  • Use updated Anti-virus and regularly check for malware, bots on your systems. (This way you are less likely to contribute to DDoS on others).
  • Use multiple ISPs or hosting providers for redundancy.
  • Maintain a backup site for quick switchover.
  • Install or configure network monitoring systems which can alert you as soon as any DDoS hits.
  • Check with your ISPs or hosting providers how they handle DDoS and be aware of financial implications in case you are hit with a massive DDoS.

Dealing with a DDoS underway is incredibly difficult. The first step should be to try to understand the type and source of the attack. Understanding the attack type greatly helps in effectively dealing with the attack. Some of the things that you may consider are:

  • Blackholing and sinkholing
  • Enable rate-limiting in firewalls, routers, load balancers and other network perimeter devices.
  • Obtain a new IP address or range from your ISP or hosting provider if the attacker is targeting an IP address or range. If you have multiple ISPs then try switching your primary ISP.
  • Switch to something like Akamai, Cloudflare or Incapsula who have known expertise to handle DDoS.

What to do post the incident?

  • Conduct a root cause analysis and ensure that no other malicious activity was done on your servers other than DDoS.
  • If blackholing or sinkholing was done, restore the same.
  • If the preventive measures listed above are missing, you may consider implementing some of them to be better prepared.

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

The Biggest Threat To Enterprise Is The Thumb Drive

How did Iranian nuclear facilities was destroyed? With a thumb drive. And how did Snowden allegedly smuggle out the blueprints to the NSA? With a thumb drive.

No, it wasn't by some ultra secretive means of super-complex cyber code writing and cloud encryption by which good ol' Eddy breached America's security in arguably the most secure compound on the planet — nope — he simply walked in with a thumb drive, downloaded the NSA, and walked out.

Carl Weinschenk of IT Business Times breaks down how bad a threat flash drives can be:
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security ran a test in which staffers dropped flash drives in the parking lot of government and contractor buildings. Sixty percent of folks who picked them up simply plugged them into networked computers. That percentage jumped to 90 percent if the drive had an official logo.
The Washington Times breaks down the threat further by reminding everyone that a "number of commercially available programs can switch off the USB port of every computer on the network."

NSA officials “were laying down on their job if they didn’t disable the USB port,” an unnamed government IT the specialist told the Washington Times, referring to the small socket on the side of a computer where thumb drives are plugged in.

Organizations, whether they're public or private, have had difficulty enforcing Bring Your Own Device security measures now for a number of years. Certainly there are places in government buildings where there are NO recording devices or storage devices allowed under ANY circumstances.

Regardless, Snowden managed to get one in and get one out.

Monday, July 29, 2013

The Risk of Data on Mobile Devices & in the Cloud

Ponemon Institute research finds that 69% of respondents listed mobile devices as posing the greatest risk

A recent study by the Ponemon Institute, The Risk of Regulated Data on Mobile Devices and in the Cloud, sponsored by WatchDox, reveals a stunning need for improvement on managing the risks of mobile devices and cloud computing services.

The survey involved 798 IT and IT security practitioners in a variety of organizations including finance, retail, technology, communications, education, healthcare, and public sector, among others.

The study concluded that “[t]he greatest data protection risks to regulated data exist on mobile devices and the cloud.” 69% of respondents listed mobile devices as posing the greatest risk followed by 45% who listed cloud computing.

Some other key findings include:

  • Only 16% of respondents said their organization knew how much regulated data “resides in cloud-based file sharing applications such as Dropbox, Box, and others.”
  • Only 19% said their organization knew how much regulated data was on mobile devices.
  • Only 32% believed their organizations to be “vigilant in protecting regulated data on mobile devices.” Nearly three quarters said that employees didn’t “understand the importance of protecting regulated data on mobile devices.”
  • 43% of organizations allow “employees to move regulated data to cloud-based file sharing applications.”
  • Although 59% of organizations permit employees to use their own mobile devices “to access and use regulated data,” only about a third have a bring your own device (BYOD) policy.
  • In the past two years, the average organization had almost 5 data breaches involving the loss of theft of a mobile device with regulated data on it.

What are the risks?

  1. Unsafe Security Practices: With their own mobile devices and with their own cloud service provider accounts, employees might engage in unsafe security practices. Mobile devices might not be encrypted or even password-protected. When using cloud services, employees might not have the appropriate settings or an adequately strong password. They might not understand the risks or how to mitigate them.
  2. Choice of Cloud Service Provider: There are many cloud service providers, and they vary considerably in terms of their privacy and security practices. Cloud service providers may not have adequate terms of service and may not provide adequate privacy protections or security safeguards.
  3. Regulatory Troubles: If an employee of a HIPAA covered entity or business associate shares protected health information (PHI) with a cloud service provider, a business associate agreement is likely needed. Employees who just put PHI in the cloud might result in their organization being found in violation of HIPAA in the event of an audit or data breach.
  4. The Ease of Sharing: Sharing files is quite easy with many cloud providers – sometimes too easy. All it takes is a person to accidentally put regulated data into a shared file folder, and . . . presto, it will be instantly shared with everyone with permission to view that folder. One errant drag and drop can create a breach.
  5. The Ease of Losing: If you don’t carry an umbrella on an overcast day, it surely will rain. And if you put regulated data on a mobile device without adequate protection, that device will surely be lost or stolen. Call it “Murphy’s Mobile Device Law.”

What should be done?

  1. Educate the Cs: The C-Suite must be educated about these risks. These are readily-preventable risks that can be mitigated without tremendous expense.
  2. Develop Policies: The study indicates that there is often a lack of policies about the use of mobile devices and cloud. There should be clear written policies about these things, and employees must be trained about these policies.
  3. Educate the Workforce: Everyone must be educated about the risks of mobile devices and cloud and about good data security practices. According to the Ponemon Study, “Respondents believe that most employees at one time or another circumvent or disable required security settings on their mobile devices.” Employees must know more about the risks of using unapproved cloud service providers, as well as the special risks that cloud service applications can pose.
  4. Instill Some Fear: The study reveals that almost systemically at most organizations, the risks of mobile and cloud are underappreciated and often ignored. There needs to be a healthy sense of fear. Otherwise, convenience will win.

The Ponemon Study reveals that there is a long way to go before most organizations adequately address the risks of mobile and cloud. The problem runs deeper than the fact that these risks are hard to redress.

The problem seems to stem from the fact that the risks are woefully underappreciated by many in organizations, from the top to the bottom. That has to change, and soon.

Thursday, July 18, 2013

Forecast on Top Trends in Data Breach, Privacy and Security

12 trends in privacy and security

First identified as an industry issue a decade ago, data breaches are now part of the consumer vocabulary. Data breaches have evolved from credit card fraud with financial consequences to medical identity theft with life-threatening implications.

According to leading experts, the frequency, severity, and impact of data breaches are expected to escalate. Industry experts :

1. Global criminals: Criminals are now globally connected and increasingly part of organized crime rings.

2. Advanced persistent threat (APT): APT is the biggest threat to organizations, whereby hackers gain access to a network and remain there undetected for a long period of time.

3. Malicious attackers: Hacktivists and national states have an advantage over today’s defenders of corporate data and IT infrastructure.

4. Breaches affect everyone and everything: Breaches affect large and small businesses of all kinds, regardless of sophistication, and high- and low-tech information.

5. Information can be infinitely distributed, causing limitless damage: The electronic health information privacy breach epidemic is an unanticipated “game changer” in that health information can be stolen from anywhere in the world, distributed to an infinite number of locations for an infinite period of time and can cause limitless damage.

6. Increased enforcement risk: Regulators at both the federal and state levels in many foreign countries have become, and will continue to be, increasingly aggressive in investigating security breaches and obtaining substantial monetary settlements or penalties from responsible organizations.

7. Identity theft will not go away, until the issue of identity is solved: "Identity-proofing" consumers involves verifying and authenticating with numerous technologies, and the flexibility of consumers to recognize a slight trade-off of privacy for security.

8. Real-time prevention: The rate of exposure for personally identifiable information is now so great, we must concede that the data itself is no longer able to be protected. Our defensive strategy must now shift to real-time prevention of the abuse of this sensitive information by criminal elements.

9. More digital devices and technologies, to digitize personal data: Drones, utility smart meters, automated license plate readers, and more powerful facial recognition software - all used to collect and digitize consumers' sensitive personal data - will provide more opportunities for government to resell consumer data, forcing consumers to demand better privacy protections and read/approve/decline company privacy statements.

10. Many data breaches are avoidable if commonsense security practices are in place: In recent cases where companies experienced data breaches, the companies' security practices did not protect against even readily foreseeable threats. Companies need to use “reasonable and appropriate security measures” for handling consumers’ personal information.

11. Long-term monitoring: Data obtained by hacking, theft or unauthorized access, isn't always used immediately by the perpetrators. Organizations need to develop a tactical plan for incident response that includes persistent, long-term diligence and monitoring, due to the possibility of lag time that can occur between the time of the breach and the fraudulent use of consumer information.

12. Continued business naiveté: Corporations continue their delusional belief that data security and cyber privacy are a byproduct of purchasing better technology. It helps, but it's the human beings using the technology correctly (or not, in the case of most breaches) that actually delivers results. Forward-thinking companies will focus assets on training the stewards of their valuable data.

Sunday, July 14, 2013

Five Ways To Plump Your Security Program Without Going Broke

Some are quick, cheap and often free! Others require a little more time and critical thinking

Addressing cyber-attacks is not just a technology issue. It requires a holistic view from the entire organization. Today's security threats span a broad spectrum of social engineering schemes, international hackers, and insider threats like the recent NSA breach.

It's easy to get overwhelmed by all of the potential threats and where money should be spent to keep up, let alone stay ahead of the curve. Security functions are getting only 70 percent of the resources that they need to do an adequate job" of securing the business, including hardware, software, services and staff. 

The hard stuff is in the next 30 percent." Meanwhile, worldwide spending on security infrastructure, including software, services and network security appliances used to secure enterprise, rose to $60 billion in 2012, up 8.4 percent from $55 billion in 2011, according to Gartner Inc. That number is expected to hit $86 billion by 2016.

Security experts offer five tips for enhancing security that don't cost a lot of cash — and sometimes no money at all — so companies can spend their security dollars on the hard stuff.

1. Patch security holes and identify vulnerabilities

Three of the top 10 botnets reported in February 2013 were more than 8 years old, according to Fortiguard Labs, the threat-researching arm of network security firm Fortinet Inc. in Sunnyvale, Calif. In the most successful attacks, the majority of those threats had been identified and fixed by vendors years earlier, said Derek Manky, global security strategist.

Companies need to keep patches up to date.

2. Install your free firewall and antivirus upgrades

A lot of people don't realize their basic support contracts with most vendors for support, firewalls and antivirus include free upgrades. If you don't have a strategy to revisit what the available technology is that you've already paid for, then you're missing out on a lot of new features and enhancements" that could prevent a security breach. 

Call your vendor and revisit our firewall and antivirus solution contracts.

3. Keep up with BYOD

Personal devices in the business environment are here to stay. Yet 79 percent of businesses had a mobile security incident in the past year, ranging from malicious apps downloaded to a mobile device to unsecure Wi-Fi connections to lack of security patches from services providers, according to a June mobile security report by Check Point Software Technologies.

These mobile security incidents cost companies between $100,000 and $500,000 in staff time, legal fees and resolution processes.

Organizations can improve mobile device security through BYOD agreements with users to ensure they take security precautions. The checklist should include installing available upgrades and patches; ensuring that each mobile device infrastructure component has its clock synced to a common time source; reconfiguring access control features as needed, according to the Computer Security Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

4. Define a enterprise-wide security strategy

Nine out of 10 big companies lacked defined security strategy and security plans, or they re not tied with business goals and business objectives. There's no way to know if you're supporting business objectives unless you take the time to develop the security strategy and make they're sure they're doing the most important things for overall risk reduction. 

5. Educate Employees

Successful attacks are usually ones that exploit the human mind. Humans are always the weakest link in the chain.

Education can help stop employees from falling victim to phishing attacks or pretexting schemes or careless use of login credentials, which accounted for 3 of the top 10 threat actions performed against large companies, according to Verizon's 2012 data breach investigations report.

Friday, July 5, 2013

Why Security Teams Fail PCI Audits?

5 Key Challenges in the way of successful auditing!

For any business accepting credit or debit card payments from its customers, Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards (PCI DSS) compliance - which offers comprehensive standards to enhance payment card data security - is an absolute must.

But for most, ensuring continuous compliance (the ongoing monitoring of rules rather than waiting for audits to show non-compliance) with the vast and ever changing set of rules can be a real drain on resources. 

The 5 'C's

Undoubtedly one or all of the following challenges are getting in the way of successful auditing…the five 'C's:

Complexity- enterprises have hundreds of firewalls, routers and switches, all with their own complex configurations and thousands of access rules. All have to be tracked and catalogued which makes it almost impossible to comply with all the PCI DSS rules.

  • Change - hundreds of changes every week amounts to thousands of changes to track from one audit to the next. The combination of rapid change and time pressures mean mistakes happen which can leave businesses wide open.
  • Connectivity - configuration errors very easily lead to compliance issues and service downtime. A high number of rule changes can compromise cardholder data, which can leave businesses compromised until their next audit.
  • Compliance - audits are time intensive and usually changes are unchecked between audits making the process even more laborious. Yet businesses cannot afford to fail an audit.
  • Communication - poor communication and a siloed culture of app owners and IT security can mean a comprehensive compliance check between audits is extremely complicated and difficult to manage.

PCI DSS auditing doesn't always need to be a costly and thankless task. While compliance will always be essential for most enterprises, automation solutions can make it a much more efficient process - by slashing time spent on repetitive, manual work so that security teams can focus on strategic tasks such as security architecture, research and education.

Saturday, May 18, 2013

Cyber Infrastructure Protection Guidelines by Strategic Studies Institute

It provides the foundation for long-term policy development and a roadmap for cyber security

Increased reliance on the Internet and other networked systems raise the risks of cyber attacks that could harm our nation’s cyber infrastructure.

The cyber infrastructure encompasses a number of sectors including: the nation’s mass transit and other transportation systems; banking and financial systems; factories; energy systems and the electric power grid; and telecommunications, which increasingly rely on a complex array of computer networks, including the public Internet.

However, many of these systems and networks were not built and designed with security in mind. Therefore, our cyber infrastructure contains many holes, risks, and vulnerabilities that may enable an attacker to cause damage or disrupt cyber infrastructure operations.

Threats to cyber infrastructure safety and security come from hackers, terrorists, criminal groups, and sophisticated organized crime groups; even nation-states and foreign intelligence services conduct cyber warfare.

Cyber attackers can introduce new viruses, worms, and bots capable of defeating many of our efforts. Costs to the economy from these threats are huge and increasing. Government, business, and academia must therefore work together to understand the threat and develop various modes of fighting cyber attacks, and to establish and enhance a framework to assess the vulnerability of our cyber infrastructure and provide strategic policy directions for the protection of such an infrastructure.

This book addresses such questions as:

  • How serious is the cyber threat?
  • What technical and policy-based approaches are best suited to securing telecommunications networks and information systems infrastructure security?
  • What role will government and the private sector play in homeland defense against cyber attacks on critical civilian infrastructure, financial, and logistical systems?
  • What legal impediments exist concerning efforts to defend the nation against cyber attacks, especially in preventive, preemptive, and retaliatory actions?
Refer here to download the book.

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

4 Ways to Defend Against State Sponsored Attacks

Enterprises Challenged to Safeguard Their Infrastructure

With reports - the latest one issued this past week from the Defense Department - that document the Chinese military and government targeting key government, military and business computer systems in the United States and elsewhere, operators of those systems face a challenge of defending their IT assets.

Security experts generally agree that the best defense against nation-state attacks needn't be tailored to a specific attacker. No one solution will help organizations to defend against nation-state attacks, whether from China, Iran, Russia or elsewhere. Still, knowing who's attacking IT systems can help organizations better plan their defenses.

One of the key differences between state-sponsored espionage and organized crime or hackers is their level of persistence and determination to break through defenses.

Security experts say fundamental cybersecurity and risk management practices, if implemented properly, should reduce the damage done from all types of attackers, including those from nation-states.

Here are four steps organizations can take to shore up their defenses against nation-states cyber-attacks, although not all of these approaches would be appropriate for each organization:

  • Avoid acquiring technology from companies based in nations that pose a threat;
  • Isolate internal networks from the Internet;
  • Share cyberthreat information with other organizations;
  • Enhance employee cybersecurity awareness programs, including testing worker' knowledge of best IT security practices.

Friday, May 10, 2013

No Room For Guessing Games in Information Security

The Global Cost of Cyber Security?

The information security industry, for the large part, has been working hard to reshape how users think about security. Before this reshaping took place, security was a nuisance for enterprises, was overlooked by developers (i.e., security-as-a-fix instead of security-at-inception), and was unknown to end users.

Fortunately, the trend is changing. For example, CXOs are now less reluctant to approve those line items in the budget related to securing their enterprises and end users are becoming more aware of cyber security and its consequences. 

For me, trying to estimate the global cost associated with cybercrime is one of those ‘somethings’. The inherent complexity associated with the global space of cybercrime events prevents us from calculating a reliable cost estimate with respectable accuracy and precision.

Not so long ago, Symantec asserted that cybercrime was costing us about $110 billion per year. Around the same time, McAfee stated that cybercrime was instead costing us approximately $1 trillion per year. I wonder which one is right? It’s a conundrum, indeed.

For years, I have watched these sorts of global cost estimates travel across the wire, and yet I have found little use of the information because the data points are, with absolute certainty, all over the board.

Nowadays I simply ignore these ‘informationals’ when they cross my path—long term exposure to them has desensitized me. However, these changes would not have occurred if our industry was desensitizing our target audience with inaccurate information.

The moral of this story—we as security professionals need to focus on relaying relevant information to the rest of the world and to do so as accurately as possible. There is no room for guessing games in our industry.

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Can Enterprise rely on MDM to achieve Mobile Security?


mRAT spyware bypasses mobile enterprise controls
Mobile remote access Trojan (mRAT) infections are increasing and bypassing mobile enterprise security controls, putting businesses at risk of cyber espionage, research has revealed.
mRATs are capable of intercepting third-party applications such as WhatsApp, despite guarantees of encrypted communications, the study of 2 million smartphone users by Lacoon Mobile Security found.
The research also showed that mRATs are similarly able to bypass security controls in mobile device management (MDM) systems, which a growing number of businesses rely-on for mobile security.
mRATs are designed to carry out cyber espionage and typically enable eavesdropping on calls and meetings, extracting information from email and text messages and location tracking of executives.
The spyware requires a backdoor for installation, through the rooting of Google Android or the jailbreaking of Apple iOS devices.
The research found that mRATs can bypass rooting and jailbreaking detection mechanisms installed on handsets, with 52% of infected devices found running iOS and 35% running Android.
The attacks undermine the basic notion of a secure container on which most MDM systems are based, according to Lacoon Mobile Security.
MDM systems create secure containers that separate business and personal data on the mobile, in an attempt to prevent business-critical data from leaking.
However, the research team demonstrated that mRATs do not need to directly attack the encryption mechanism of the secure container, but can grab it at the point where the user pulls up the data to read it.

Mobile best practices and technologies include:
  • Remotely analyse the risk involved with each device, including behavioural analysis of the downloaded applications;
  • Calculate the risk associated with the device's operating system vulnerabilities and usage;
  • Conduct event analysis to uncover new, emerging and targeted attacks by identifying anomalies in outbound communications to C&C servers;
  • Enable network protection layer to block exploits and drive-by attacks and contain the device from accessing enterprise resources when the risk is high.