Security incidents remain secret amongst CIOs, but is there good reason to be more vocal?
Few CIOs will discuss their security incidents in public — with good reason — but there are many compelling reasons for more openness.
You cannot ignore the risk of cyber-attack. No vulnerability will be left unturned by cybercriminals, bedroom hackers, pressure groups or anonymous citizens looking to disrupt an organisation’s business.
Attacks of all kinds are increasing in intensity and more firms are having to admit to being victims of them. This means that any company currently embarrassed by an attack or incident should take some solace from the fact that they are not alone.
Equally significant is the fact that the firms were apparently ready and willing to discuss what was happening, and what they were doing about it.
The most recent and perhaps most notorious attacks came as part of the fallout from the WikiLeaks scandal when each side of the privacy debate began a war of attrition that sought to prevent the other from having their place on the internet.
Firms including Amazon and Visa refused to support the WikiLeaks cause by hosting its documents or accepting donations for it respectively, and became enemies of a loose collective of hacktivists that lurk under the name ‘Anonymous’. Anonymous, which had already showed its muscle in opposition to the Digital Economy Act, acted swiftly and effectively.
Refer here to read more details.